201410.23
0

Compensation Claims for Rejuvenate Hip Implants take a Step Forward

Compensation claims for Rejuvenate hip implants have taken a step forward with the announcement that twenty cases sent for mediation have been resolved.

Stryker´s Rejuvenate and ABG II hip implants were recalled in 2012 after it was found that cobalt and chromium was leaching from the implants and causing inflammation, tissue wear and the failure of the implants.

Unlike the highly publicized Depuy ASR hip implant recall – due to metal-on-metal friction between the cup and the ball of the implant – the metallosis in Rejuvenate and ABG II hip implants originates from a poorly fitting joint in the stem of the implant.

Consequently, revision surgery to replace Rejuvenate and ABG II hip implants is significantly more invasive and involves a surgeon removing the stem of the implant from the patient´s femur. Cables are then placed around the femur to allow it to heal before a new hip implant can be fitted.

The consequences to the patient are that the procedure takes considerably longer than other types of hip revision surgery, and the patient suffers more residual disability. These factors impact settlements of compensation claims for Rejuvenate hip implants and ABG II hip implants, as the patient experiences a greater level of pain and suffering and is immobile for a considerably longer period of time.

More than 4,000 compensation claims for Rejuvenate hip implants and ABG II hip implants have been made against Stryker to date and, according to a court document issued earlier this month, twenty claims which form part of the multi-county litigation (MCL) taking place in Bergen County, New Jersey, have been resolved.

No details are available about how much compensation for Rejuvenate hip implants each plaintiff has received as this may compromise future trials but, in addition to the settlements, the Honorable Brian R Martinotti – the judge presiding over the Bergen County MCL – announced that two “bellwether” cases have been scheduled for June 15 and July 13, 2015.

This is a significant step forward in the litigation process for plaintiffs who are waiting to resolve their compensation claims for Rejuvenate hip implants, and although there has been no movement in the multi-district litigation in progress in Minnesota under Judge Donovan Frank, it could signal an early conclusion for everybody who has suffered an injury due to a faulty Rejuvenate or ABG II hip implant.

Potential plaintiffs who have not yet made compensation claims for Rejuvenate hip implants and ABG II hip implants should speak with a lawyer as soon as practically possible.

201306.05
0

DePuy to Cease Production of Pinnacle Metal-on-Metal Hip Replacement Systems

DePuy Orthopedics Inc has announced it will cease production and sales of its Pinnacle metal-on-metal hip replacement systems by August this year.

The announcement to cease the production and sale of Pinnacle metal-on-metal hip replacement systems coincides with the start of the Multi District Litigation being heard in Ohio (DePuy Orthopedics, Inc. ASR Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation – MDL 2197) in which more than 7,500 claimants are claiming compensation for injuries sustained due to the company´s sister product; the DePuy ASR XL Acetabular Hip Replacement System.

The company´s decision to end the production of Pinnacle metal-on-metal hip replacement systems is believed to follow the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) closing the loophole known as the ‘510(k) process’ which allowed the faulty hip replacement systems onto the market without clinical testing first being conducted.

Although the Pinnacle hip replacement systems originally passed the FDA´s clinical testing standards in 2000, the ASR hip replacement systems were given FDA clearance on the grounds that they were “similar to an existing product” – in this case the DePuy Pinnacle metal-on-metal hip replacements.

Following the worldwide withdraw of the ASR hip replacement systems in August 2010, FDA officials asked DePuy Orthopedics to conduct further clinical tests on the Pinnacle hip replacements systems to ensure that they were safe medical products. DePuy declined the FDA´s request.

Since August 2010, a second MDL class action has been started against DePuy Orthopedics, in which more than 3,300 claimants allege that they suffered an injury due to the DePuy Pinnacle hip replacement systems.

DePuy´s announcement to cease  production of the Pinnacle metal-on-metal hip replacements overshadowed the scheduled start of the MDL court hearing in Ohio; where a jury has now been sworn in and will first be asked to deliberate on a motion argued by lawyers representing DePuy Orthopedics that the size of any compensation settlement should be limited an appropriate size relation to the company´s home state of Indiana – where personal injury compensation settlements are significantly lower than in Ohio.

201201.30
0

Large number of Metal-on-Metal Hip Implant Recall Compensation Claims Likely

An increase in the number of metal on metal hip implant compensation claims is likely following revelations that medical regulators are revising their advice for patients who have received metal on metal hip replacement systems in the UK.

Advisors to the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) want to extend the advice already provided for patients who received the recalled DePuy hip implant which was withdrawn from use in August 2010. Currently, patients are being recommended to have the implant x-rayed on an annual basis and have a blood test taken to check for high levels of “system toxicity”.

Concerns exist that microscopic particles of chromium and cobalt – displaced when friction occurs between the metal ball and cup of the implant – are entering the bloodstream and causing damage to the patient´s organs and neurological system. These concerns are in addition to the high volume of failure rates seen with the recalled DePuy ASR metal on metal hip replacement systems which have been responsible for patients experiencing hip inflammation, infection and tissue necrosis.

Stephen Cannon, a consultant orthopaedic surgeon for the Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, has advised that the bone wear and tissue necrosis caused by these metal on metal hip implants can make revision surgery more complicated, more painful to the patient and requiring a longer post-operative period of rehabilitation. Consequently, not only is the number of metal on metal hip implant injury compensation claims expected to increase, but also how much compensation for replacement hip implant surgery each victim is entitled to.

Following the DePuy metal on metal hip implant recall, the MHRA told orthopaedic surgeons to contact every hip replacement patient to ensure they were monitored. However Professor Joe Dias, president of the British Orthopaedic Association, claims that only 41 per cent of patients who received a DePuy metal on metal hip implant were registered on the National Orthopaedic Register and, although many may have undergone the recommended checks without their details being centrally logged, he was concerned that some may never have been contacted.

It is not certain exactly what new advice will be issued by the MHRA, or when the new recommendations will be announced; however, with a higher awareness of the health risks presented by the recalled DePuy metal on metal hip implants and more people having to undergo difficult revision surgery, the number of metal-on-metal hip implant compensation claims will surely rise.

201102.18
0

FDA Issues Advice for Patients with MoM Hip Replacement Devices

The American Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued new advice for patients with metal on metal (MoM) hip replacement devices due to an increased number of illnesses being reported attributable to metal particles from the MoM hip replacement devices entering the blood stream.

In a number of cases it has been reported that microscopic traces of chromium and cobalt have caused illnesses with recipient´s hearts, nervous systems, thyroid glands and kidneys. This is addition to the more common problems associated with MoM hip replacement devices such as inflammation in the hip area, pain in the groin and a change in the recipient´s ability to walk as friction develops between the metal ball and cup of the MoM hip replacement devices.

The FDA has recommended that patients with MoM hip replacement devices should consult with their doctor should they experience chest pains or a shortage or breath, deterioration in vision or hearing, fatigue and coldness, or a change in urination habits. Although these symptoms cannot be confirmed as being attributable to a failure in the MoM hip replacement devices until such time as the results of a blood test have been reviewed by an orthopaedic surgeon, an early diagnosis can potentially save those with MoM hip replacement devices a considerable amount of pain and discomfort if revision surgery is required.

The same microscopic particles which are responsible for these symptoms are also know to wear down the bone around the implant area and cause tissue necrosis. These issues make revision surgery of MoM hip replacement devices far more complicated and less likely to succeed. Patients undergoing revision surgery where the bone and tissues are not fully intact also require a longer rehabilitation period to recover from their operation and return to normal life.

What this would mean for those making injury compensation claims is that settlements of compensation for MoM hip replacement devices would have to reflect the increased level of pain and recovery time in addition to compensation for the personal injury they have sustained. However, according to the advice issued by the FDA, it is the patient´s best interests to monitor their health carefully for signs of illness which could be due to the potential system toxicity of MoM hip replacement devices.